<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>usclettermen.org &#187; public schools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.usclettermen.org/tag/public-schools/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.usclettermen.org</link>
	<description>Providing Information on Getting into the Best Education in California</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:02:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Desparate Times For Some California Schools</title>
		<link>http://www.usclettermen.org/9/desparate-times-for-some-california-schools</link>
		<comments>http://www.usclettermen.org/9/desparate-times-for-some-california-schools#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California Education News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california public schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elementary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elementary school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elementary schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[middle school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[middle schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school calendar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school district]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school teacher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school teachers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teachers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usclettermen.org/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A large part of the country&#8217;s education systems have long looked to California Schools to demonstrate what works in education. While many California Public Schools are indeed exemplary, there are also many that are struggling. In 1999, the state of California decided that it needed to take a closer look at these struggling schools, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">A large part of the country&#8217;s education systems have long looked to California Schools to demonstrate what works in education. While many California Public Schools are indeed exemplary, there are also many that are struggling. In 1999, the state of California decided that it needed to take a closer look at these struggling schools, and that these California Schools needed help to overcome their problems.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The California Schools in question shared one common characteristic &#8211; a relatively high level of student poverty. Many but not all of them have high percentages of students who were English learners and/or Hispanic, a statistic that has been correlated with student poverty. Most have very small populations of white students.</p>
<p><span id="more-9"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">These troubled California Schools tended to be larger than average and were much more likely to be on a multitrack, year-round calendar. This type of school calendar allows the school in question to serve a greater number of students by being open all 12 months of the year; with some California Schools teachers and classes sharing rooms with those who are off on a break.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In terms of staffing, these California Schools had a much higher proportion of teachers not fully credentialed and were also more likely to have a high percentage of first- and second-year teachers.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Principals of the California Schools in question were surveyed to determine the differences in the challenges faced by their particular schools. School district officials were also able to provide more information.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">California has operated its school accountability system for nine years now and the average API (Academic Performance Index) scores for all schools have risen. Elementary schools have shown the most progress. However, as a whole, elementary level California Schools have faced greater challenges than their middle- and high-school counterparts. On average, they had either similar or more challenging proportions of English learners and students living in poverty. School sizes are modestly large and the proportion of fully credentialed teachers is somewhat lower than middle- and high-school teachers working in California Schools.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conversely, California Schools in the middle and high school levels have consistently shown less improvement than elementary schools. From a statistical perspective, secondary California Schools often face different challenges than elementary schools do in attempting to meet their API growth targets.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Middle Schools have not had the full benefit of the state’s investment in K–12 education since the mid-to-late 1990s, however. From an instructional perspective, the state has put more focus on improving achievement in the earliest grades, most likely with the belief that if a student’s academic success can be improved upon at an early age, they will continue to be successful throughout their school careers.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">While there many changes that need to be made to improve the quality of California Schools, it is indeed heartening to see that the state’s board of education is up to the challenge of helping schools make the improvements needed to produce successful and vital members of tomorrow’s society.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">California Public Schools Patricia Hawke is a staff writer for Schools K-12, providing free, in-depth reports on all U.S. public and private K-12 schools. For more information please visit California Public Schools</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Patricia_Hawke</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.usclettermen.org/9/desparate-times-for-some-california-schools/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Record 377 California Schools Honored with the Distinguished School Award</title>
		<link>http://www.usclettermen.org/6/a-record-377-california-schools-honored-with-the-distinguished-school-award</link>
		<comments>http://www.usclettermen.org/6/a-record-377-california-schools-honored-with-the-distinguished-school-award#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California Education News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california distinguished school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[county school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distinguished school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[educational]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elementary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elementary school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elementary schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no child left behind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school award]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school district]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school districts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usclettermen.org/?p=6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The California Schools created the California Schools Recognition Program in 1985. Its purpose is to publicize and reinforce California schools priorities, which are to improve student scholastic achievement and promote students based upon measurable objectives. The program identifies and honors public schools that exhibit exemplary and inspiring achievement. Though participation in the program is voluntary, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">The California Schools created the California Schools Recognition Program in 1985. Its purpose is to publicize and reinforce California schools priorities, which are to improve student scholastic achievement and promote students based upon measurable objectives. The program identifies and honors public schools that exhibit exemplary and inspiring achievement. Though participation in the program is voluntary, the California Distinguished School Award is highly coveted.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">To be considered for the award, California schools must meet a variety of eligibility requirements. These include designated federal and state accountability measures that are based upon the No Child Left Behind, Adequate Yearly Progress, and Academic Performance Index measurement programs. Approximately, five percent of California schools are selected each year for the award, with no fewer than 40 counties typically being represented.</p>
<p><span id="more-6"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The program alternates awards yearly between the elementary and secondary California schools. Year 2006 honors elementary schools.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">California schools that meet the requirements complete an application and submit it to a team of local educators from across the state, which evaluate and score the merits of each school application. Schools with the highest scoring applications are selected as statewide nominees for the award. Nominated California schools then receive an onsite visit by a team of county school superintendents and members of the California Department of Education, who validate the accuracy of the application data.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Those California schools selected for the Distinguished School Award are honored at a statewide ceremony, where the state school superintendent awards a plaque and flag to each school. The program and annual ceremonies are funded through the generosity of prominent California corporations and statewide education organizations that believe educational excellence should be rewarded and encouraged publicly.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In 2006, a record 377 public elementary schools were honored with the California Distinguished School Award, surpassing the 302 elementary schools honored in 2004 — the last elementary school award cycle. They represent the largest number of elementary school awardees in the 21-year history of the program.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The 2006 California schools awardees were chosen from 190 school districts in 40 counties. They were selected from the largest number of eligible elementary schools to date, setting another record for the program. Of the more than 5,000 elementary schools in California, 2,043 were eligible to apply for the 2006 award. California schools are proving that student scholastic excellence can be nurtured and consistently improved.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Patricia Hawke is a staff writer for Schools K-12 , providing free, in-depth reports on all U.S. public and private K-12 schools. Stacy has a nose for research and writes stimulating news and views on school issues. For more on California schools visit California Schools</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Patricia_Hawke</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.usclettermen.org/6/a-record-377-california-schools-honored-with-the-distinguished-school-award/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Studies Find Multiple Strategies Needed to Improve California Schools</title>
		<link>http://www.usclettermen.org/3/studies-find-multiple-strategies-needed-to-improve-california-schools</link>
		<comments>http://www.usclettermen.org/3/studies-find-multiple-strategies-needed-to-improve-california-schools#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California Education News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california public schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no child left behind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no child left behind act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teachers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usclettermen.org/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the past three years California Schools have been the subject of an in-depth analysis of school reform. The study, Beyond the Mountains: An Early Look at Restructuring Results in California, conducted by the Center on Education Policy (CEP), is part of a multi-year review of the effects of the No Child Left Behind Act [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">For the past three years California Schools have been the subject of an in-depth analysis of school reform. The study, Beyond the Mountains: An Early Look at Restructuring Results in California, conducted by the Center on Education Policy (CEP), is part of a multi-year review of the effects of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) on Maryland, Michigan and California Schools.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The examination concerns specific restructuring methods used by California Schools and their success. According to CEP founder and president Jack Jennings, “While it is still too early to tell whether restructuring is working, it is clear from the experience of California and Michigan, the two states we have studied in-depth, that simply requiring schools to replace staff does not guarantee increased student achievement. Rather, success is linked to implementing multiple improvement strategies.”</p>
<p><span id="more-3"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">This is of critical concern to California Schools for a couple of reasons. California Schools have more schools facing restructuring than most other states for several reasons. School restructuring is mandated by the NCLB act for any schools unable to meet its Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) markers for five or more consecutive years. One reason that California Schools saw the number of its schools facing this mandate double to 8% in the last year is because of its massive size. Also, California Schools implemented AYP markers a year before it was federally mandated. Of the California Schools facing restructuring, over 60% are in urban areas.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The numbers don’t look good. 207 of the California Schools in the implementation phase of restructuring failed to meet AYP standards for seven consecutive years. That’s why the CEP study has such import. The study concluded that the California Schools that were most successful in raising student achievement were those that analyzed school data and implemented initiatives designed to meet those specific needs. This is important because the US Department of Education previously recommended replacing staff rather than other forms of restructuring.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Other reform methods in California Schools include instituting English Language Learner programs, direct coaching for teachers and principals, changes in scheduling and the hiring of a district-level coordinator. The California Schools that used the above methods, without replacing staff or changing to a charter system, were generally more successful than the other schools studied. What will this mean for the future of California Schools?</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">It’s likely that funds for teacher planning time, instructional coaches and special instruction for at-risk students will appear on coming legislation. As noted by Jennings, the California Schools still have a long road ahead before the success of many programs can be fully evaluated. That’s why California Schools need the quantifiable results of a study like this one.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Patricia Hawke is a staff writer for Schools K-12, providing free, in-depth reports on all U.S. public and private K-12 schools. For more information please visit California Public Schools</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Patricia_Hawke</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.usclettermen.org/3/studies-find-multiple-strategies-needed-to-improve-california-schools/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
